|
APPENDIX
1 - DESIGN PRINCIPLES
Introduction
This Annex
sets out the design principles, which have provided the building blocks
of the Masterplanning approach. The principles have been derived from
best practice and design guidance from a number of sources including:
- Llewelyn-Davies
(2000), Urban Design Compendium, English Partnerships
- Urban
Task Force (1999), Towards an Urban Renaissance: Final Report of the
Urban Taskforce, DETR
- National
Playing Fields Associations (unknown), Open Space Requirements, NPFA
- Childrenís
Play Council, (unknown), Home Zones: Reclaiming Residential Streets,
National Childrenís Bureau Enterprises Ltd
- Transport
2000 (1999), Living Streets,Transport
2000 Trust
- Planning
Policy Guidance Notes, DETR, various
- Salford
City Council (2001), Supplementary Planning Guidance: Designing Out
Crime, Salford City Council
In addition
to drawing on the best practice set out in the above documents, the principals
set out in this appendix also draw on the direct experience of Building
Design Partnership in designing other urban regeneration and masterplanning
projects in which the latest thinking on design and development is implemented.
These include:
- Allerton
Bywater Millennium Community, Leeds
- Westoe
Millennium Community, South Shields
However
whilst examples from elsewhere are useful it is important that the design
solutions and the building blocks of the Masterplan closely match the
needs and aspirations of the local community and also respect to the unique
characteristics of the area.
Context
By context
we mean the historical, social and geographical setting of the area. The
consideration of context is important to ensure that development is coherent
with the existing conditions of the a site and its surrounding area and
can be effectively incorporated into that area. In relation to context,
the Urban Design Compendium sets out six key priorities, namely:
- Strengthening
local communities - a community lead process incorporating the views,
custom and policy of local communities and other stakeholders;
- Creating
a sense place - having regard to regional identity and local character
in terms of urban form, socio-economics, natural features and linkages
to surroundings;
- Harnessing
site assets and resources - working with assets in terms of natural
resources, landscape and buildings and enabling brownfield land to be
re-used;
- Integrating
with its surroundings - understanding existing linkages and movement
patterns and integrating new movement provision into that network;
- Ensuring
feasibility - the economic constraints in terms of supply & demand,
funding and ownership and the; and
- Creating
a vision.
The remainder
of the Annex is structured under headings of key issues and concepts,
under each of which the key principles are set out to demonstrate how
these principles can be implemented in practice. A series of images showing
best practice is contained at the end of this annex.
MIXED
USES
IDEAS
& ISSUES
- Combining
the primary activities of living and working support secondary facilities
of a commercial, leisure or community based nature and this palette
of uses will serve to make a place
- Compatible
uses - with adequate consideration at the detailed design stages most
conflicts between uses can be resolved however the needs of individual
uses must be known to avoid the potential for conflict.
- Mixing
uses can take place vertically (e.g. living above shops) or horizontally
(e.g. offices next to apartments)
- Mixing
uses also takes into account mixing tenures to add variety to the types
of housing and ownerships and avoids the development exclusive or deprived
neighbourhoods
- Mixing
uses allows vibrant centres to develop which are used throughout the
day and night.
- Mixing
uses can also enable areas with specific character or identity to develop
such as the Jewellery Quarter in Birmingham.
BENEFITS
- More
convenient access to facilities
- Travel
to work congestion is minimised
- Greater
opportunities for social integration
- Socially
diverse communities
- Visual
stimulation and delight of different building within close proximity
- Greater
security afforded by extended hours of activity
- Greater
energy efficiency and more efficient use of space
- Increased
choice of lifestyle, location and building type Urban vitality and street
life
- Increased
viability of urban facilities and small business such as corner shops
LINKS
& OPPORTUNITIES
- Mixed
use and tenure offers the potential for workspace or community facilities
to be included in redevelopment proposals
- Most
developments could include an element of mixed use
- Transition
Zones between city centres and suburban neighbourhood such as the masterplan
area offer great opportunities for mixed use
FURTHER
READING
- Llewelyn-Davies
(2000), Urban Design Compendium, English Partnerships
- Urban
Task Force (1999), Towards an Urban Renaissance: Final Report of the
Urban Task Force
NEIGHBOURHOOD
/ VILLAGE UNITS
IDEAS
& ISSUES
- Mixed
use development is best promoted through the creation of village units
in which the facilities required by the community can be accessed within
walking distance
- 400m or
5mins walk is generally accepted as maximum distance which people must
walk to access a neighbourhood centre with corner shop, a bus stop and
open space
- An area
must be sufficiently densely populated to support these facilities,
for example a bus stop requires c500 people within its catchment to
make it viable.
- Such neighbourhood
units should be well connected to the movement network by a range of
means of transport
BENEFITS
- Neighbourhood
units go hand in hand with mixed use development which create vitality
in areas and with high density development which improves the viability
of the provision of goods and service
- With basic
facilities available within easy walking distance and higher order facilities
accessible through public transport decreased use of the car is enabled
- Village
/ neighbourhood units help to create a sense of community in which people
know and look after each other
LINKS
& OPPORTUNITIES
- The concept
of neighbourhood unit impacts upon the design of developments by discouraging
the creation of ëestatesí and single us areas
- More dense
and walkable neighbourhoods could lead to environmental benefit such
as decreased need for car use and increased viability of services such
as recycling and public transport.
FURTHER
READING
- Llewelyn-Davies
(2000), Urban Design Compendium, English Partnerships
- Planning
Policy Guidance 13: Transport
HOUSING
AND STREETS
IDEAS
& ISSUES
- Areas
of housing should be sufficiently dense to support the provision of
local services
- Safe and
secure streets and houses are essential to urban communities, one way
of achieving these is through the creation of Home Zones / Play Streets
- Homes
zones are areas in which pedestrians and cyclists have priority in the
streets and children can play safely without danger from cars
- Traffic
speeds are dramatically slowed down to 10 mph through traffic calming
- A new
emphasis is given to streets through planting, street furniture, rearranged
parking and use of alternative landscape materials
- Traditional
streets of terraced housing or courtyard developments lend themselves
well to the home zones concept.
BENEFITS
- Street
become a public place for all residents to use and this greater use
leads to lower levels of crime and fear of crime because of increased
activity
- Home zones
help to create good relations between residents strengthens community
links
- Home zones
make it safer for children to venture past their front gate alone and
play in the street and safer for old people and those with disabilities
to walk in the street
- Physical
activity is encouraged which improves the health of communities
- Encourage
walking and discourages use of the car thereby decreasing noise and
air pollution
- Parking
can be safely and securely accommodated in on street lay-byís or within
courtyard developments
- Street
and parking areas are overlooked by houses increasing safety and reducing
crime
- Home
zone schemes have been successful throughout Europe and in pilot schemes
in the UK
LINKS
& OPPORTUNITIES
- Home zones
are especially compatible with neighbourhood units as they promote walking
and cycling and enable high density urban neighbourhoods which support
shops, services and public transport
- Home
zones / play street offer significant contributions to the network of
spaces within a neighbourhood
- The increase
street activity and secure parking afforded by home zones is an important
crime prevention design feature
FURTHER
READING
- Children's
Play Council, (unknown), Home Zones: Reclaiming Residential Streets,
National Childrenís Bureau Enterprises Ltd
- Transport
2000 (1999), Living Streets, Transport 2000 Trust
- DETR (2000),
Planning Policy Guidance: Housing, DETR
DESIGNING
OUT CRIME
IDEAS
& ISSUES
- Crime
is not just a social but also a design issues and there are many ways
in which crime can be combated through the design of developments
- The definitions
between public, semi-private and private space should be clearly marked
by a physical or symbolic barrier (fencing or change of landscaping
materials for example)
- Each property
should include an element of ëdefensible spaceí within it which distinguishes
the change in ownership and enables individual character to show
- Streets,
walkways, open spaces and parking areas should be overlooked and benefit
from increased security of the natural surveillance of surrounding properties,
courtyard parking is a good example of this which should be designed
to enable
- Architecture
should foster an element of territoriality giving actual or psychological
ownership to users of a space
- CCTV and
lighting can be used to great effect in educing crime and the fear of
crime
- Alleys
to the rear of properties and those obscured by planting, corners or
any other places to hide should be avoided
- Cul-de-Sacs
are vulnerable to crime
- Mixing
uses and creating wider hours of activity reduces crime
BENEFITS
- Crime
and the fear of crime against the person which are a major barrier to
night-time activity in some areas is reduced by surveillance and lack
of hiding places for criminals
- Homes
and cars are safer from crime through clearly defined public and private
spaces overlooked by properties
- A sense
of ownership and community pride can be fostered by designing in territoriality
and defensible space
- Increased
hours of activity make for more vibrant places
LINKS
& OPPORTUNITIES
- Mixing
uses is a key element of designing out crime and offer new opportunities
for residents
- Home
zones are highly compatible with the key themes in designing out crime
FURTHER
READING
- Llewelyn-Davies
(2000), Urban Design Compendium, English Partnerships
- Salford
City Council (2001), Supplementary Planning Guidance: Designing Out
Crime, Salford City Council
- DETR
(1994) Circular 5/94: Planning Out Crime, DETR
- DETR
(2000), Planning Policy Guidance 3: Housing, DETR
TOWER
BLOCKS
IDEAS
& ISSUES
- Tower
blocks offer appropriate accommodation to many members of the community
and have many desirable features and can be popular amongst those without
young children
- Gardens
and staircases within homes are often unpopular and tower block can
provide for these desires
- Where
tower blocks are structurally sound, improvements can be made to make
the safe, sustainable and attractive to residents
- Such improvements
could include: enclosing the space around towers to improve security,
especially around parking areas; recladding and lighting to improve
the external appearance of blocks; and the provision of a concierge
/ security service for tower blocks
- Mixing
uses at ground floor level is also possible and could provide residents
with access to community / leisure facilities or shops / services
BENEFITS
- Tower
blocks afford high density urban living which makes the provision of
shops, services (such as recycling) and public transport more viable
- Tower
blocks can effectively cater for the needs and desires of some members
of the community
- Effective
environmental and security improvements can enable tower block to make
a positive contribution to appearance and character of neighbourhoods
LINKS
& OPPORTUNITIES
- Tower
Blocks can incorporate a mix of uses and give new opportunities for
residents and improved access to facilities.
FURTHER
READING
- Cunningham
J. (2001), 'Tall Order' in Guardian Society, 28 February 2001, Guardian
Newspapers
- www.towerblocks.ork.uk
, National Sustainable Tower Blocks Initiative
SPACES
IDEAS
& ISSUES
- Urban
communities should have access to a network of spaces which can be civic
or play space, formal or informal, open or within streets such as home
zones
- All residents
should be within 100m of an area in which small children can securely
play (e.g. play streets), 400m of a local park with at least 5 pieces
of childrenís play equipment and within 1000m of a neighbourhood park
with at least 8 pieces of play equipment for teenagers / young people
- Consideration
should be given to the needs of small children, young people and adults
in the provision of spaces
- Children's
provision should include robust play facilities within a secure environment,
whilst youths may want informal ëkickaboutí space or special facilities
such as skate ramps, and adults may like parks to walk, sit and relax
- Home zones
and play street add an extra dimension to the provision of spaces at
a localised level
- It is
important to define the role of spaces (i.e. for children, young people
or adults) so that the potential for conflict between users is minimised
- Access
to spaces should be easy and routes to them safe
BENEFITS
- Increased
access to high quality open spaces catering for the needs of all sections
of the community will increase the levels of activity and health
- Environmentally,
parks and open spaces provide a ëgreen lungí for urban communities
- Well designed
spaces which are overlooked and secure mean that children and young
people can play out in a safe environment
- Green
spaces provide important urban habitats for wildlife
LINKS
& OPPORTUNITIES
- Secure
route through spaces encourage walking and cycling and can make for
a pleasant trip to access local shops and services within a neighbourhood
unit, minimising the need to use the car
- Along
with home zones, open spaces form part of a the movement and recreational
network of a neighbourhood
FURTHER
READING
- National
Playing Fields Associations (unknown), Open Space Requirements, NPFA
- Llewelyn-Davies
(2000), Urban Design Compendium, English Partnerships
MOVEMENT
IDEAS
& ISSUES
- There
is a need to create a network of safe convenient routes for walking,
cycling, public transport and cars
- New direct
routes linking nodes of activity should be created to ensure that the
areas is walkable
- The various
modes of transport must share the streets
- Vehicle
speeds in residential areas should be radically slowed down using home
zone principles of traffic calming, landscaping and pedestrian / cyclist
priority
- Pedestrian
/ cycle routes should be safe, secure (overlooked where possible) and
well lit.
- Provision
for public transport should be a key consideration
- New development
should focus around nodes of activity and movement such as local centres
where shops, services and public transport is provided, densities in
these locations should be high to make public transport more viable
- New connections
to places people want to visit should be made
BENEFITS
- The reliance
on the private car is reduced as realistic and safe alternatives are
available
- Decreased
car use has benefits for the environment and traffic problems
- Street
become active for longer periods because people feel safe using them,
this enable a wider ranges of uses to occur within a neighbourhood
- Less use
of the car and increased use of alternative forms of transport increase
activity levels and health amongst the population
LINKS
& OPPORTUNITIES
- The successful
creation of networks of movement and open space are vital to the success
of each other
- Home zones
and reduced crime enable increased movement and increased hours of movement
- Increased
movement and street activity creates vibrant neighbourhoods and enables
mixed use
FURTHER
READING
- Llewelyn-Davies
(2000), Urban Design Compendium, English Partnerships
- Urban
Task Force (1999), Towards an Urban Renaissance: Final Report of the
Urban Task Force, DETR
DESIGN
IDEAS
& ISSUES
- Good design
should be the aim of all those involved in the development process and
should be encouraged everywhere
- The image
and perception of an area to residents visitors, business and other
stakeholders is heavily influenced by the quality of design of the physical
environment
- The highest
possible quality of design should be sought in all types of development
and in all areas
- A balance
must be struck between ensuring high quality design and not discouraging
development through the additional costs required for high quality design
- The public
realm, and other areas in the responsibility of public agencies should
set an example for private developments through high quality design
and materials
- High quality
design should incorporate public spaces
- Design
offers significant opportunities for the involvement of local communities
in shaping the environment in which they live and work
BENEFITS
- The image
and enjoyment of an area can be dramatically improved by quality design
in buildings and public areas making the areas a delightful place to
live and work
- If an
area has a good image, interest in the area and investment are likely
to increase
- Commentate
participation in design gives a sense of ownership and shared responsibility
for looking after an area
LINKS
& OPPORTUNITIES
- High quality
design should impact on all development including buildings (new and
refurbished) spaces and routes.
SPACES
IDEAS
& ISSUES
- Urban
communities should have access to a network of spaces which can be civic
or play space, formal or informal, open or within streets such as home
zones
- All residents
should be within 100m of an area in which small children can securely
play (e.g. play streets), 400m of a local park with at least 5 pieces
of childrenís play equipment and within 1000m of a neighbourhood park
with at least 8 pieces of play equipment for teenagers / young people
- Consideration
should be given to the needs of small children, young people and adults
in the provision of spaces
- Children's
provision should include robust play facilities within a secure environment,
whilst youths may want informal ëkickaboutí space or special facilities
such as skate ramps, and adults may like parks to walk, sit and relax
- Home zones
and play street add an extra dimension to the provision of spaces at
a localised level
- It is
important to define the role of spaces (i.e. for children, young people
or adults) so that the potential for conflict between users is minimised
- Access
to spaces should be easy and routes to them safe
BENEFITS
- Increased
access to high quality open spaces catering for the needs of all sections
of the community will increase the levels of activity and health
- Environmentally,
parks and open spaces provide a'green lung' for urban communities
- Well designed
spaces which are overlooked and secure mean that children and young
people can play out in a safe environment
- Green
spaces provide important urban habitats for wildlife
LINKS
& OPPORTUNITIES
- Secure
route through spaces encourage walking and cycling and can make for
a pleasant trip to access local shops and services within a neighbourhood
unit, minimising the need to use the car
- Along
with home zones, open spaces form part of a the movement and recreational
network of a neighbourhood
FURTHER
READING
- National
Playing Fields Associations (unknown), Open Space Requirements, NPFA
- Llewelyn-Davies
(2000), Urban Design Compendium, English Partnerships
©
Bradford Trident 2004
|